Human Trafficking – Annual Report

Human Trafficking Annual ReportThe U.S. Advisory Council on Human Trafficking recently released the first Annual Report on human trafficking written by survivors. Although this report is not specific to justice involved women, it provides “actionable recommendations to the U.S. government for its work both nationally and internationally, as it collaborates with state and local governments.” An article from The Huffington Post summarizes five recommended areas from the report to enable the federal government to better support trafficking survivors.


  1. Ensure Law Enforcement Is Trained In Anti-Trafficking
  2. Create Public Awareness Campaigns That Reflect Diversity Of Trafficking Victims
  3. Provide Support Services To All Types Of Trafficking Survivors
  4. Increase Funding To Investigate More Industries For Labor Trafficking
  5. Help Survivors Get On Track For Success In Work And Life

Access the Annual Report

Source: Human Trafficking Survivors Share 5 Ways To Help End Practice. The Huffington Post. October 18, 2016.


This announcement is available at NIC’s Gender-Responsive News for Women and Girls.  Feel free to forward to friends and colleagues.  Subscribe to the newsletter at

For additional resources on Justice-Involved Women go to NIC’s Women Offenders.

For additional resource on Human Trafficking go to NIC’s initiative on Correctional Anti-Human Trafficking.

Available Now: Pretrial Justice Broadcast Recording

If you missed the live broadcast, view the streamed version of NIC’s Pretrial Justice: How to Maximize Public Safety, Court Appearance and Release online.

Pretrial Justice: How to Maximize Public Safety, Court Appearance and Release

Live broadcast held: September 8, 2016

"The history of bail and the law intertwined with [this] history tell us that the three goals underlying

the bail process are to maximize release while simultaneously maximizing court appearance and

public safety."

— Timothy R. Schnacke, J.D., L.L.M., M.C.J., Fundamentals of Bail

Courts in the United States process millions of criminal cases annually. Each requires a judicial officer to determine the conditions of a defendant's release pending adjudication-bail. Bail determination is one of the most important decisions in the criminal case processing, designated as a "critical stage" by the United States Supreme Court where liberty and due process interests are paramount. Justice systems that administer bail effectively have as their overarching goals assuring a defendant's return to court and safeguarding the community. To help balance the individual's right to reasonable bail with the public's expectation of safety, these systems assess the likelihood of missed court appearances or new criminal activity using factors shown by research to be related to pretrial misconduct and provide supervision designed to address these risks. Moreover, these systems give judicial officers clear, legal options for appropriate pretrial release and detention decisions. As a result, unnecessary pretrial detention is minimized, public safety is enhanced and, most significantly, the pretrial release process is administered fairly.

Unfortunately, most local justice systems lack truly effective bail decision making components. Most judicial officers do not receive the information needed in bail setting to make the best decisions about release and detention, nor do they have a full statutory gamut of release and detention options to address the varying levels of risk found within the defendant population. Even when options exist, most systems lack the structure to monitor released defendants, to regularly screen detained defendants for release eligibility, or to safeguard individual rights and community safety.

The shortcomings of the current bail system have made bail reform part of the larger national discussion on improving America's criminal justice systems. For most justice systems in America, achieving true bail reform will mean going beyond technical changes to a deeper and more holistic change in culture and attitudes about the concept of pretrial release; the rights of pretrial defendants; and what is truly needed to reasonably assure future court appearance and community safety. In order to achieve meaningful bail reform, all elements of an effective pretrial justice system must be defined and in place.


During the broadcast presenters will:

  • Define the framework for developing a high functioning pretrial justice system;
  • Discuss the importance of bail history and the legal processes underlying it;
  • Identify the essential elements of a legal and evidence based pretrial justice system;
  • Identify the importance of the criminal justice system to support a legal and evidenced based pretrial services agency; and
  • Discuss the differences between technical and adaptive change within organizations and the effects on implementation.

This broadcast will answer the following questions:

  • What is the roadmap to pretrial justice reform? Where do we begin?
  • What is the history of bail reform, and why is it important to your work today?
  • What are the essential elements of a high functioning pretrial system?
  • What outcomes could you expect from collaboration among pretrial justice stakeholders?
  • What changes are needed to become a high functioning pretrial justice system?
  • "What are the benefits of developing a pretrial agency?

View the streamed version here

Changing the Course: Preventing Gang Membership

Changing the CourseThis recent publication from The Office of Justice Programs and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Changing Course: Preventing Gang Membership, provides practitioners and policymakers with knowledge about why kids become involved in gangs and offers effective and promising strategies that prevent them from doing so.

Highlights from the publication include:

  • Gangs are a serious, persistent problem in the United States; according to the National Youth Gang Survey, from 2002 to 2010 the estimated number of youth gangs increased by nearly 35 percent — from 21,800 to 29,400 nationwide.
  • Although girls join gangs for many of the same reasons boys do, there are a few gender differences; for example, girls — particularly in abusive families — are more likely than boys to regard a gang as a surrogate family.
  • Community partnerships are crucial to reducing the attraction of gangs; these should include youth, their families, law enforcement, public health, schools, faith-based organizations, and groups that offer recreational programs, employment and job-training skills.
  • SARA — Scanning, Analysis, Response and Assessment, the primary problem-solving model used by law enforcement — and the public health prevention model share complementary data-driven components, which can be used in building initiatives and partnerships that prevent youth from joining gangs.

Access the full article


This announcement is available at NIC’s Gender-Responsive News for Women and Girls.  Feel free to forward to friends and colleagues.  Subscribe to the newsletter at

For additional resources on Justice-Involved Women go to NIC’s Women Offenders.

Status Of DC Jail

A year after the Washington Lawyers’ Committee released a blistering report on the state of D.C.’s largest jail, little has changed at the 40-year-old facility. The findings, which included rat infestations, sewage leaks, and defective temperature controls, inspired local lawyers and prisoner rights advocates to demand immediate intervention by city government. But the building has […]